In an Iranian Image, a Missile Too Many

INSERT DESCRIPTIONIn the four-missile version of the image released Wednesday by Sepah News, the media arm of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, two major sections (encircled in red) appear to closely replicate other sections (encircled in orange). (Illustration by The New York Times; photo via Agence France-Presse)

Latest update at 3 p.m. Eastern Agence France-Presse has retracted the image as “apparently digitally altered.” More developments at the bottom of the post.

As news spread across the world of Iran’s provocative missile tests, so did an image of four missiles heading skyward in unison. Unfortunately, it appeared to contain one too many missiles, a point that had not emerged before the photo was used on the front pages of The Los Angeles Times, The Financial Times, The Chicago Tribune and several other newspapers as well as on BBC News, MSNBC, Yahoo! News, NYTimes.com and many other major news Web sites.

INSERT DESCRIPTIONThe Los Angeles Times, The Palm Beach Post and Chicago Tribune, among others, used the image on their front pages on Thursday.
INSERT DESCRIPTIONOur home page at 3:56 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday.

Agence France-Presse said that it obtained the image from the Web site of Sepah News, the media arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, on Wednesday. But there was no sign of it there later in the day. Today, The Associated Press distributed what appeared to be a nearly identical photo from the same source, but without the fourth missile.

As the above illustration shows, the second missile from the right appears to be the sum of two other missiles in the image. The contours of the billowing smoke match perfectly near the ground, as well in the immediate wake of the missile. Only a small black dot in the reddish area of exhaust seems to differ from the missile to its left, though there are also some slight variations in the color of the smoke and the sky.

Does Iran’s state media use Photoshop? The charge has been leveled before. So far, though, it can’t be said with any certainty whether there is any official Iranian involvement in this instance. Sepah apparently published the three-missile version of the image today without further explanation.

For its part, Agence France-Presse retracted its four-missile version this morning, saying that the image was “apparently digitally altered” by Iranian state media. The fourth missile “has apparently been added in digital retouch to cover a grounded missile that may have failed during the test,” the agency said. Later, it published an article quoting several experts backing that argument.

Along with major doubts about the image, American intelligence officials had larger questions on exactly how many missiles were fired. One defense official said that “at least 7, and possibly up to 10″ had taken flight in all, though the intelligence data was still being sorted out. Only one of them was said to be a Shahab 3.

Throughout the day, several news sites have taken steps to disown the photograph that they ran on Wednesday, including LATimes.com and MSNBC.com.

In a sentiment no doubt echoed by news organizations everywhere, an MSNBC editor acknowledged that the four-missile picture was initially welcomed with open arms. “As the media editor working the msnbc.com home page yesterday, I was frustrated with the quality of a fuzzy video image we published of the Iranian missile launch,” said Rich Shulman, the network’s associate multimedia editor. “So I was thrilled when the top image crossed the news wires.”

Mark Mazzetti contributed reporting from Washington.

INSERT DESCRIPTIONINSERT DESCRIPTIONTop, the image that Agence France-Presse obtained from Sepah News on Wednesday. Below, another image that The Associated Press received from the same source on Thursday, which appeared to be taken from the same vantage point at almost the same time.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

hilarious! clearly someone thought 4 missiles would be 33% more scary than three… or they thought it really tied the composition together, which, I have to say, it actually does.

More likely they use open source gimp

Sounds like both pictures are Photoshopped to delete the image of a missile misfiring.

Bee, Manchester, NH July 10, 2008 · 9:32 am

Is that another Psyops war?

It looks like the missile on the launcher didn’t fire and whomever published the photo didn’t want to release the story that only 3 out of four were successful.

Could this be a Wag The Dog situation by the U.S. government???

Why would anyone want to photoshop that image? Are four missiles that much more threatening/ominous than three? I don’t get it.

Looks like Photoshop to me.

They simply edited out the one that didn’t go off and made it look as if it had. It was all about appearances, not performance anyway, they are too clever ever to use these things. They probably used Gimp (not Photoshop) anyway…you can hide a weapons development plant, but you can’t get away from Adobe that easily.

I am sorry but these images look completely difgferent. What are you even talking about?

Most governments use disinformation to manipulate the media. The US government did it to justify invading Iraq under the pretense that it had “weapons of mass destruction.” Compared to that, a photo of 4 versus 3 missiles is really insignificant. It is important however for the media to avoid being so gullible, or complicit, in propagating the disinformation to the public.

dangiurca.4t.com

More fake photos…where did I see this before?

This is an obvious Photoshop without question, and it’s not even remotely professional. It looks like it was done by a 5 year old kid. Note the top of the dirt pile on the right was even copied too. It might have been done in 1 minute or so.

It looks as though, from the second photo. That the missile still on the truck is a dud. The Iranians were probably covering up this fact.

Well isn’t this just the perfect 21st century politico-aesthetic allegory?

This is pretty funny, even though the mullah’s genuinely lack a sense of humor and nobody is laughing at their ill intent. Perhaps Israel could Photoshop a giant “Dome of Silence” over its country… That should fool ’em.

Well done by the press to discover the true nature of the photos. Too often we accept at face value what world leaders want us to believe, and it is nice to see that journalism has not yet bowed entirely to the whims of the few.

We’ve seen our own administration do this as well- I remember the photo of Bush during the ’04 election with a crowd of photoshoped soldiers surrounding him.

Anyone with digital photo editing experience can spot this from a mile away. Someone has clearly used the photoshop healing brush to doctor the image, then tried to blend rough edges with the eraser tool. They did a terrible job. In the overall point of the image though, does it matter if there are four or three? and is this an image from the Iranian military or a poor attempt at sensationalism by a reporter at AFPresse? (look carefully at the truck they took efforts to erase).

That’s oddly amusing.

Are you sure the second picture isn’t just a picture taken before the second missile from the right was fired? The other three missiles appear to be slightly higher in the first photo and the rocket flames seem to differ between the two photos as well.

If Photoshop missiles are all that Israel and the U.S. have to worry about, I’ll be sleeping well tonight.

Why didn’t they just Photoshop an entire army?

this is shisty.

I know that missiles aren’t a laughing matter, but this really is funny. The bigwigs in Iran try to be all tough, but a crappy photoshop job just makes ’em look like schmucks. I’ve seen kids do better photo doctoring than that!

Looking at the top picture you can even see the lighter shade of blue surrounding the third missile on the right. You’d think they would put together something better than just the clone stamp!